Ops Closure v1 — Human Compatibility Form

Status

This remains a useful human closure form.

It is no longer the canonical machine reentry contract. Current Office v2 execution receipts and reentry proposals own machine semantics.

Purpose

After a manual block, leave enough information that governance can reenter without reconstructing the session.

Minimum form

front: <front_id or clear referent>
result: <done|partial|blocked|no-change>
evidence: <proof>
closure: <what changed / remains>
next: <restart instruction or none>
escalate: <yes/no + reason>

Optional recommendations

A human closure may also suggest:

• carry/posture change;
• follow-up;
• waiting condition;
• Principal review;
• weekly horizon/grouping.

These are recommendations. They do not mutate canonical state by themselves.

Invariants

1. Evidence describes what actually happened.
2. partial and blocked should leave a concrete restart pointer.
3. done does not need a fake next step.
4. Repository links are evidence/context, not front identity.
5. Horizon/cadence suggestions belong to Weekly Governance policy.
6. Machine execution should use the current Office v2 receipt/reentry path rather than serializing this compatibility form.

Why keep this

The form is fast, memorable, and useful for human/manual work.

Keeping it does not require preserving the old Office v1 queues or state model.